Canon EOS 5DII bez offtopic!

[Fatman]

i ponownie zaproszę na swojego fotobloga tym razem udostępniłem linka do wywołanych (ACR 5.2) zdjęć z D3 i 5D Mk II -łatwiej i szybciej będzie je można zaciągnąć i porównać

http://fatman73.fotolog.pl/ -zapraszam

[RadioErewan]

To co? Wracasz do Canona?

Pozdrawiam

[rocco]

To co? Wracasz do Canona?

Też jestem ciekaw...

[grizz]

Nie wraca.

AF camuń ma gorszego Szumi tez bardziej.

[piotrek204]

Test fotopolis:
http://www.fotopolis.pl/index.php?n=8294

[qbic]

najs, ciekawe jak imatest wypadnie

[Fatman]

w chwili obecnej nie śmierdzę groszem, że tak powiem -dlatego poczekam sobie spokojnie na tego D700x czy tam D800 -chocby do jesieni.......

[heyahero]

Nowy firmware do 5D mkII. Podobno sobie z czarnymi plamami poradzili:
NEWS:http://www.dpreview.com/news/0901/09...d2firmware.asp

--> http://web.canon.jp/imaging/eosd/fir.../firmware.html

[rocco]

Opinia Kena:

The Canon 5D Mark II costs a little more, and the choice between the two is easy. The 5D Mark II is the best thing Canon makes, but the D700 is better for almost everything.

The D700 wins for just about everything, especially action and taking pictures of your friends, family and kids. The D700 has superior autofocus performance over the Canon 5D Mark II. The 5D Mark II's AF system is inferior for photographing moving kids in dim light. All my D700 shots made with a 50mm f/1.4 indoors are just about perfect, most of my 5D Mark II shots made with a 50/1.4 USM just can't nail the focus because the 5D Mark II lacks the face recognition of the D700. The D700 magically focuses on a moving kid's nearest eye, while the 5D Mark II usually mis-focusses on his shirt, sleeve or background. At f/2, depth of field is so narrow that most of my 5D Mark II photos are useless for moving kids. Who needs 21MP if they're out of focus?

If you have incredible Canon lenses and regularly make prints many yards (meters) wide, the Canon 5D Mark II has more pixels, but the AF and ergonomic (handling, speed and comfort) performance of the D700 is superior. The 5D Mark II is mostly plastic, while the D700 is mostly metal. The D700 is sculpted to feel great in your hands all day, while my hands start to hurt fast holding the less well designed 5D Mark II. Nikon shooters can't believe that when you take a picture on the 5D Mark II, that you can't zoom or look at any other pictures until you use your other hand to press the play button manually!

Get the 5D Mark II if you're photographing things that hold still or pose for you AND you need to print them Bismarck sized, otherwise, get the D700.

Ja tam mu wierzę

Linek

[diabolique]

Ja tam mu wierzę

Ja też