Zaloguj się

Zobacz pełną wersję : [DPR] Olympus' Toshi Terada discusses the future of Four Thirds and compacts



RSSBot
2.02.13, 05:56
The long wait for the next generation of cameras for Four Thirds may soon be over, suggests Olympus' Toshi Terada, Manager, Product Planning SLR products. He also discusses the role the OM-D E-M5 has played in increasing uptake of mirrorless cameras in the USA and the future of compact cameras now that smartphones have become many users' cameras of choice.
The progress of mirrorless in the USA'Market share for mirrorless is increasing in the USA. It's not booming, but it's growing. Now Canon and Nikon have mirrorless products, that will help increase awareness of what mirrorless is and what the benefit is. In addition, the OM-D has become a really big topic of conversation in both the US and Europe. Those two factors are creating a better situation for the mirrorless market,' he says.
'We have three groups of people buying our cameras - OM-D users are mostly people who would have bought a DSLR, then you have users stepping up from compacts and buying PEN models. Then, finally, you have DSLR users who are buying PEN as a second camera. Other manufacturers aren't targeting all those people.'
'DSLR-type users are used to beautiful lenses, but we also like to offer lenses for the step-up users - lenses like the 45mm. One of the main reasons for buying a DSLR or mirrorless is the good image quality, including shallow depth-of-field. The kit lens is versatile, but to give the shallow depth-of-field you need a fast lens. The 45mm is positioned as a second or third lens, as is the body cap lens. How to motivate these users to buy lenses is very important for all manufacturers.'
'In Japan, the work to encourage people to buy a second lens has been a success. The 45mm lens has also sold well in Europe and USA but it's selling to the DSLR type of user.'
The future of Four ThirdsBuilding on the promise Olympus has made about continuing to support Four Thirds users, Terada suggests the wait may nearly be over: 'Direction-wise, we'd like to produce products for Four Thirds and Micro Four Thirds within this year. Because we have to provide a product for users with SHG and HG lenses. But there are still people using E400, 500 and 600-series DSLRs; those users would like to have a step-up camera. We have to provide products for both kinds of Four Thirds users.'
'For those users, AF speed is important and a suitable finder is necessary. And also it needs to be the right size - the benefit of Micro Four Thirds and Four Thirds is compact size. We have to provide those things to benefit those users. One of the benefits of phase-detection autofocus is continuous autofocus. We have to provide a product for Four Thirds users and we have to be able to promise total AF performance.'
They can be confident about image quality, he says: ''They already know image quality from the OM-D. Four Thirds and Micro Four Thirds sensors are the same size, so they can imagine that.'
Where now for compacts?**is this a quote?**Smartphones have had impact on compact camera sales - especially for affordable compacts. We have to make some kind of differentiation from smartphones, whether that's in terms of image quality, optical capabilities or photographic control. We've shifted to high-value products - long zoom, enthusiast compacts and TG-type cameras that have benefits to differentiate them from smartphones.
From a sensor aspect this can mean bigger, but a camera needs optics. To have optics with an APS-C sensor, capability cannot be offered. **unclear; what capability cannot be offered?** Another format combination is something I can see happening - you need to have something that works size-wise as well as quality-wise. If you consider APS-C, you're never going to make a very compact lens. Maybe 1" or 1/1.7" or some intermediate size could exist in the future, I can't judge at this moment. The XZ-10 is still attractive - together with a nice lens and imaging chain it can offer a big difference from smartphones.


Więcej... (http://www.dpreview.com/articles/7898773566/cp-2013-interview-with-olympus-toshi-terada)

szafir51
2.02.13, 08:47
Ciekawe co z tego wyjdzie. W 4/3 można spodziewać się nowej puszki z matrycą OM-D, w m4/3 zapewne następca e-pl5.

apz
2.02.13, 09:10
Jestem zainteresowany oboma liniami produktów, E-X dla siebie i E-XX lub E-XXX dla moich dziewczyn używajacych E-520 i E-420. Piękną rzeczą byłoby móc wykorzystywać i ch i moje szkła przez kolejnych 5 lat bez zastanawiania sie nad losami systemu, a jeszcze piękniejszą dokupienia sobie pary ZD 14-35 i 35-100. Potem mogę już nie szukać żadnych obiektywów 4/3 przez lata. Co najwyżej dać zarabiać serwisowi na przeglądach moich szkieł. no może poza jakimś ZD 300/4 SWD.

Moominek
2.02.13, 11:05
Hmm, gdyby taki E-620 z bebechami OM-D i rzucam żółtego w diabły. Ech... Tylko czemu tak długo i nadal obiecanki?

strOOs
2.02.13, 11:12
Fajnie jakby puścili właśnie 2 puszki - E-XX i E-X.

szafir51
2.02.13, 12:23
strOOs

jestem przekonany, że tak zrobią. Może E-7xx, czyli 620 z nieco lepszym ekranem i matrycą sony oraz E-7?!? jako topowy produkt O. z uszczelnieniami, gibanym LCD, itp. Może dorzucą jeszcze troche Mpix.

Zapotrzebowanie na entry-level jest ogromne, ale prostym aparatem Oly nie odzyska rynku DSLR. Musi być coś w górnej póły. Ciekawe tylko co zrobią z filmowaniem - jeżeli to przegapią to lipa, mamy XXI wiek, z punktu widzenia marketingu ta funkcja po prostu musi być i już.

C+
2.02.13, 13:51
Zostało mi trochę szkieł z E-1 więc czymś nowym w sensownych rozmiarach, dobrym AF i matrycą z OM-D nie pogardziłbym.

Do mikrusów raczej nie powstaną jasne tele, bo miałby się to z celem jeżeli chodzi o wielkość zestawu.

gietrzy
2.02.13, 15:35
Nowa puszka dla użytkowników 4/3 - nie znamy tylko ceny tzn. my nie Jack ;)

- AF czyli CDAF
For those users AF speed is important

- AF-C czyli dolepiane dynamo PDAF (jak w Sony)
One of the benefits of DSLR is continuous autofocus. In this respect, we have to promise total AF performance in future.

- EVF czyli nowy Epson 2.06 MPx
and a suitable finder is necessary

- Rozmiar puszki: mniejszy od E-x większy od E-M5
And also it needs to be the right size - the benefit of Micro Four Thirds and Four Thirds is compact size.
And there are people using E400, 500 and 600-series DSLRs

- sensor: stary jary niezatapialny E-M5
They can be confident about image quality, he says: They already know image quality from the OM-D. Four Thirds and Micro Four Thirds sensors are the same size, so they can imagine that.


Przypominam, że powyższe to odpowiednio poszarpane cytaty przedstawiciela Olympusa z centrali, który ma w zwyczaju mówić "no comments"; tu, tych było sporo.Czego brakuje?

- wideo tryb M T/N?
- .dng jako trzecia opcja obok orf po przełączeniu z jpg T/N
- EVF - raczej " w kiosku" ze względu na lepszą stabilizację
- "Japonia tu Europa, jak mnie widzisz? - 25/50p T/N
- jaki: standard czy tele jasny kit

Moim zdaniem to będzie w cenie E-M5. Golas czyli bez dynama do dużych szkieł z baterią i paskiem ;)
Alternatywa dla serii 400/500/600

---------- Post dodany o 14:32 ---------- Poprzedni post był o 14:24 ----------


Hmm, gdyby taki E-620 z bebechami OM-D i rzucam żółtego w diabły. Ech... Tylko czemu tak długo i nadal obiecanki?

No jakie obiecanki?

Terada suggests the wait may nearly be over: Direction-wise, we'd like to produce products for Four Thirds and Micro Four Thirds within this year.

This year w tłumaczeniu na nasze znaczy 1. sierpnia J.O. daje zielone światło na wysyłkę paczek do Rycerzy.

---------- Post dodany o 14:35 ---------- Poprzedni post był o 14:32 ----------

Jeszcze jedno by mi ułatwiło polecanie mikroolków: działający tryb panoramy (jeden uśmiech do Sony).
Po miesiącu od premiery ww aparatu odpowiednia aktualizacja softu do E-PM2/PL5.